Hi Tomoki, I've compared the listed redshifts with those that were measured at the VLT for objects that are common. Object Subaru VLT VLT classification ================================== SuF02-060 1.062 1.063 Ia* SuF02-065 0.554 1.181 Ia They are both interesting candidates. SuF02-060 ---------------- There was some doubt in the classification. With a spectrum of the host without the SNe, we might be able to make a more secure classification. SuF02-065 --------------- The classification is secure. The redshift is based on identifying [OII]. I believe this is a case of a distant SN with a faint host and bright nearby galaxy. SuF02-061 --------------- There was an earlier Subaru spectrum of SuF02-061. From that spectrum, I measured z=1.085 from a number of lines. See http://www.sc.eso.org/~clidman Regards, Chris. On Apr 4, 2005, at 11:33 AM, Tomoki Morokuma wrote: > Dear Gerson, > > I have received spectroscopic results in last fall in the SXDS > from a person who analyzes Subaru/FOCAS data. > > See the table on the web. > http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~tmorokuma/study/SN/subaru2002fall/host> > 6 host galaxies are identified, but one (SuF02-097) is an AGN. > In the list of SNe whose redshift you want to know, > only SuF02-004 with "brass quality" light curve > turns out to be at z=1.187. > > Thank you. > > Tomoki > >>> 'SuF02-004','SuF02-034','SuF02-051' >>> .95 .9 1.3 >>> c a a >>> >>> SuF02-056','SuF02-057','SuF02-058','SuF02-068', >>> .82 1.5 .95 -- >>> b a a d >>> >>> 'SuF02-076','SuF02-079','SuF02-086','SuF02-J01','SuF02-J02' >>> 1.4 0.96 1.4 1.08 1.08 >>> a* c c b a >>> >>> ,'SXDS_1-a','SXDS_1-b','SXDS_2-4','SXDS_2-9','SXDS_4-3' >>> 1.05 0.75 0.5 0.8 -- >>> a a a a d >>> >>> These are the SNe which need a spectrum measurement. >>> a= gold quality a* very narrow, not Ia ? >>> b= silver quality >>> c= brass quality >>> d= no good light curve >>> the z values are given as estimated from the light curves (very >>> approximate) >>> the spectra should be taken starting with the highest z and highes >>> quality